When Is a Dying Squirrel More Important Than Dying People in Africa?

Eli Pariser spoke at TED 2011 on what he called 'filter bubbles.' Web companies like Google and Facebook focus on providing us with relevant information. Eli argues that the better they get at this, the more likely we are cut off from outside news and voices that can challenge our thinking and broaden our understanding of the world.

This is 9 minutes of video that will stick in your head the rest of the week.

Bristol Palin, Cranky Ex-Pastors and How the Brain Works

Greg Horton at The Parish linked to me last week in a post titled 'Porn and Palin (Bristol), or Having a Baby Doesn't Increase Your IQ.' The post is well-worth a read. Greg is my all-time favorite pastor-turned-agnostic, and I highly recommend reading everything he writes.

Greg references me on executive function (EF)--a collection of higher-order cognitive processes that manage lower-order functions. EF is responsible for all sorts of cognitive activity, including things like goal-setting, impulse control and problem solving.

I speak on EF quite a lot, but I never blog about it. I'm mystified as to why I've never written much publicly about it, but Greg's post prompted me to fix that.

Here's what he wrote: 

I'm told by the uber brilliant Jay Kelly that one of the functions of the brain that I thought was shared by everyone is in fact not. That sub-function of executive function allows the possessor to analyze a situation and say why it's similar to other situations with a different set of circumstances. It's a gift for creating accurate analogies between disparate fields of study or diverse human experiences: this is like that. It's helped me understand why many of my students make the shittiest analogies of all time, or why they think every analogy that refutes their weak arguments is an "apples to oranges" analogy. Like other cognitive functions, I think this one improves (for those who have it) with age. It was certainly my experience.

He's mostly right about everything he writes, but there are a few things to explain further:

1. '[O]ne of the functions of the brain that I thought was shared by everyone is in fact not.' - He's mostly right about this. EF capacity is not equally shared by everyone. Some people are better at exercising these cognitive processes than others. For example, EF influences impulse control. So imagine that 10pm rolls around, and the chocolate ice cream in the freezer starts calling your name. Your mouth starts watering at the thought of spooning out the ice cream directly from the carton, but you are torn since you don't need the empty calories 30 minutes before you head to bed. What do you do? If you're able to focus primarily on the image of getting on the scales the next morning, you'll probably stay out of the kitchen. But if your focus is more on the glorioius taste of Blue Bell Dutch Chocolate, then you're about 5 minutes away from cleaning up an ice cream moustache. 

The outcome isn't simply a matter of will power or self-discipline. It's a function of being able to cognitively emphasize your future health over a more immediate experience of pleasure. Some people do that better than others.

Where Greg's not exactly correct is that everyone does have executive function. We don't have it in equal degrees, but we do all possess these functions.

2. '[One component of executive function] allows the possessor to analyze a situation and say it's similar to other situations with a different set of circumstances. It's a gift for creating accurate analogies between disparate fields of study or diverse human experiences.' - He's dead on here. There are a few things going on when a person creates an analogy between two disparate subjects. First, she can pick out the relevant features of a subject. Second, she recognizes that those same features exist in another subject. Third, she sees that those same features are relevant features. They're not just similar, but they're similar in material, non-trivial ways.

For example, Forrest Gump's mom always told him that 'life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get.' The analogy between two disparate things--life and a box of chocolates--is made by connecting at least two relevant features that are present in each--uncertainty and variety. Those two features are present in both, AND they are fairly central features of both.

3. 'Like other cognitive functions, I think this one improves (for those who have it) with age.' Fascinating observation, and he's exactly right (except for his parenthetical comment which I already covered). As we age, our capacity to remember details diminishes. A 20 year old is much better than a 40 year old in memorizing a grocery list. But a 40 year old is far better at knowing how the items on the grocery list can be rearranged to make a dozen different meals. The 20 year old is better at remembering facts. The 40 year old is better at recognizing how those facts relate to one another. A 20 year old might be able to read sheet music and play all the right notes, but a 40 year old will be better at improvising because he more fully grasps understands how music works. He understands, not just how to read the notes, but he understands how all the pieces involved in operate together to make music.

When it comes to EF, there are two pieces of really good news for all of us:

First, we all have the broad range cognitive capacities that fall under the umbrella of EF. We are all capable of setting and pursuing long-range goals, managing conflicting impulses, analyzing new situations by drawing on past experiences, and a whole host of other cognitive abilities. Yes, we each have these capacities in greater or lesser degrees, but we all have them. 

Second, we can get better at exercising these capacities. Greg's students may currently make 'the shittiest analogies of all time,' but they can get better--much better. How exactly we strengthen EF capacities is something that has to wait for another post. But here's a short exercise to point you down the path of strengthening executive function.

Consider the analogy that life is like a box of chocolates. What are 2-3 relevant, non-trivial ways in which life isn't life a box of chocolates?

How to Stream Spotify through Your AppleTV

I got a Spotify invite yesterday, and it's as good as advertised. Most any song I can think of. Streaming on my computer. For free. I'm particularly happy that I can play songs from my growin' up years that I'd love to hear once or twice but don't want to pay for through iTunes.

But I want to play music through my AppleTV and not just my computer speakers. I can sign up for a premium Spotify subscription and stream music from my iPhone to my AppleTV using Airplay. But I'd rather not pay $10 a month for that privilege. 

With the help of the Googles, I found a solution: Airfoil by Rogue Amoeba. 

Airfoil sends audio from a Mac or Windows PC to other devices on a network. So I can launch Spotify on my MacBook Pro, and Airfoil will send the Spotify audio to my AppleTV. If I want to send the Spotify audio to another computer on the network, I can do that too. Heck, I can even send the audio to multiple devices at the same time. I have two AppleTVs--one in the living room and one in the guest bedroom. They're both playing 'Yellow Ledbetter' by Pearl Jam as I type.

Airfoil costs $25 which beats the heck out of a recurring charge of $10 a month for Spotify Premium. You can pick it up for Mac or Windows.

iPhoto Facial Recognition Fun

Playing around with iPhoto's facial recognition feature today. Here are people in my photo library that iPhoto thinks I may be . . .

1. My dad. No surprise. He would be incredibly flattered.

2. A cardboard cutout of Edward from Twilight. Um, no.

3. Same cardboard cutout. This time of Jacob from Twilight. Um, double no. 

4. Larry Mullen, Jr. from U2. You caught me iPhoto. That's me.

5. Bronze plaque of Teddy Lehman at Memorial Stadium. Nope. My neck isn't that thick.

6. Dallin H. Oaks from the LDS Quorum of the 12. I really have no idea what to say about that.

"Live the Questions." - Rainer Maria Rilke

'[H]ave patience with everything unresolved in your heart, and try to love the questions themselves as if they were locked rooms or books written in a very foreign language. Don't search for the answers, which could not be given to you now, because you would not be able to live them. And the point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps then, some day far in the future, you will gradually, without even noticing it, live your way into the answer.' - Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet

What to Do When Your Mac Won't Store Wireless Passwords

Every once in a while my MacBook Pro (running Snow Leopard) decides it's had enough of this whole wireless interwebs business and stops storing passwords to wireless networks.

So instead of automatically finding my home network, my laptop pays an homage to Guy Pearce in 'Memento' and has no memory of the network password. So I have to select the network and reenter the password. Even if I check the 'Remember My Password,' it won't actually store the password. So if I close my laptop or shut it down, I have to reenter the password again the next time I go online. 

Frustrating.

Turns out, this happens because something gets womperjawed in the Keychain.

If this happens to you, you can fix the problem with just a few clicks.

1. Go to Applications/Utilities/Keychain Access
2. Click on 'Login' at the top left of the Keychain Access window.
3. Click on the Keychain Access text menu at the top left of your screen.
4. Select 'Keychain First Aid. A new window will open.
5. Enter your main user password, select the 'Repair' radio button, and click start.

Problem solved!

How College Conference Realignment Affects Sooner Football Recruiting

Lots of talk of NCAA conference realignment floating around these days--sparked by the Big Ten's admission that they're seriously considering expansion. Here in Big 12 country, there's speculation on how that would impact our conference schools. 

How would conference realignment affect my beloved Oklahoma Sooners? It's clear that OU's fortunes--particularly its recruiting fortunes--hinge on how things shake out relative to the Texas Longhorns. Here are 4 scenarios that could happen and how OU would be affected.

1. Both schools stay in the Big 12. 

This is the most likely scenario. The danger here is that if the Big 12 loses schools (Nebraska or Missouri seem to be the most talked-about candidates), it will have to replace them with less-prestigious football schools. That would lessen the overall quality of the conference and possibly negatively impact recruiting.

Although heck, maybe it wouldn't. For years USC got great players in no small part because it was a forgone conclusion that they would roll through the Pac-10.

2. Texas goes to another conference. OU stays in the Big 12. 

This is great for OU because regardless of whether Texas goes to the Big Ten or SEC, Stoops can say to recruits' parents: 'Do you really want to fly 4 million miles for the CLOSEST away game?' OU would gain major ground in Texas recruiting.

3. Both OU and Texas leave the Big 12, but go to separate conferences. 

This would be bad for OU because they wouldn't be able to use the angle in scenario 2, plus they would lose mindshare in the state of Texas. We'd get shafted in recruiting in Texas.

4. Both OU and Texas go to the same conference. 

The Sooners would likely lose ground (over time) in Texas recruiting since other schools from the new conference would get more traction invading Texas, but they would likely gain ground (over time) in other states in the new conference because of increased mindshare among recruits.

The SEC would be favorable in this case since a) the talent is richer in SEC states and b) recruits would be more comfortable culturally with Oklahoma than recruits from Big Ten states.

Thoughts? Feedback? Stray bullets?